Archived:FrontPage: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:
* There is a significant danger that this will become hilariously expensive
* There is a significant danger that this will become hilariously expensive
* On a scale of ''n'' to ''m'', how attached are we to the idea of road-tripping as a method of transport?
* On a scale of ''n'' to ''m'', how attached are we to the idea of road-tripping as a method of transport?
** road trip = trip by interesting transport (boat? (delian league, etc.)) = defined-tickbody train trip (trans-siberian railway) > train trip > excursions from a hub by road > excursions from a hub by train
** road trip = trip by interesting transport (boat? (delian league, etc.)) = defined-tickboxy train trip (trans-siberian railway) > train trip > excursions from a hub by road > excursions from a hub by train
** For my part, I (Smith) feel a train trip would not need to be a famous proper noun in order to compare favourably with a road trip; it would need merely to be sufficiently epic in scope (viz., Moscow-Beijing, Moscow-Ulan Baator-Beijing, Berlin-Novosibirsk etc). I think a boat trip would be risky indeed, as we do not know how all participants would fare over extended periods on the ocean wave
** For my part, I (Smith) feel a train trip would not need to be a famous proper noun in order to compare favourably with a road trip; it would need merely to be sufficiently epic in scope (viz., Moscow-Beijing, Moscow-Ulan Baator-Beijing, Berlin-Novosibirsk etc). I think a boat trip would be risky indeed, as we do not know how all participants would fare over extended periods on the ocean wave